Michael Mauboussin: If there is one bit of advice you could give to an investment professional, what would it be?
Daniel Kahnemahn: Go down to Duane Reade and buy a notebook for $2 and write down your decisions. Keep an investment journal. You will be amazed at what you thought. And you will be amazed for the times you did well for the wrong reasons and so forth.
June 11, 2020 - When I first started investing a while ago I bought a deep-water oil driller called Transocean.
What have you learned from this mistake?
That just because a stock is beaten down, it doesn’t mean that it will go back up. When this position was down 67% you told a friend that it doesn’t make sense to sell now at the cyclical bottom. You were wrong. Cyclical stocks trade on fundamentals and economics just as any other company does over the long-term and as you can see there is no guarantee that a cyclical company at or near the bottom of its cycle will come back. And if it does, waiting for it to come back could become a huge opportunity cost.
Just because a company sells on a low price to sales, low price to earnings, low price to book, high div yield and has a big-name money manager buying shares, doesn’t mean the stock is a buy. Qualitative matters more than the quantitative.
You knew this was a mistake 5 or 6 years ago when you wrote about this being a mistake in MOI. Had you sold it the second you knew it was a mistake then you would have saved yourself more capital.
Spend more time understanding the business, how it makes money and what its risks are. Reading the risks section in the annual report can help with this. Also, take more time in understanding the business as opposed to buying too quickly.
Taking a loss can be beneficial to offset gains and lower taxes.
April 21, 2020 - The passage below is transcribed from the Fairfax 2019 annual group meeting hosted online on 4/16/20. Prem Watsa and Andy Bernard don't see a big effect from COVID 19 on their policies. This is a really good sign for shareholders but I have a feeling that governors and lawyers will fight for them to have to pay and this will likely go on for 1-2 years which may keep the stock price range bound. I'm still bullish though and see an opportunity for long term shareholders. The investment portfolio had some big losses though so need to keep an eye on these companies, specifically Atlas Corp.
Andy Bernard: This is of course is the headline issue I would say with the insurance industry today. How is business interruption going to impact our losses, our experience. In general, it’s our view and certainly the view of the industry that business interruption requires there to be physical damage to property in order to be triggered. That is the standard coverage in the industry for business interruption and that is the coverage that our companies in general provide. It would therefore require an overturning of the contracts in order to open them up to provide broad based business interruption coverage for losses arising from COVID 19. There are isolated exceptions to that general approach. In Fairfax those are very isolated and limited and are not a source of major concern for us. So we will monitor, we are monitoring, we are involved in some of the industry groups that are engaged in this debate going on in the United States but our view, our feeling, is that we are on very strong ground with the position that this is not covered under the general business interruption coverages that are sold in the marketplace.
Prem Watsa: And Andy just to add to that, of course, in the United States with lawyers and governors trying to overturn this and say you have to pay irrespective, as Andy says, we feel very comfortable in saying to you that it is highly unlikely that we will have to pay any significant amounts of money but if the governors try to change this, some of them are retroactively, this will go we think eventually to the supreme court and contract law is very specific. Contracts in the United States are sacred. And we think just like it is in the UK it is highly unlikely that it will be broken but it is an item that is being discussed in the [inaudible] industry.
April 7, 2020 - Howard Marks, with the help of his son, Andrew, added the following information to his most recent memo on market swings during the last two recessions which will be very helpful to keep in mind over the next 3-6 months.
"Markets rarely clear after one massive decline. In 15 bear markets since 1950, only one did not see the initial major low tested within three months... In all other cases, the bottom has been tested once or twice. Since news-flow in this crisis will likely worsen before it improves, a repeat seems likely." This quote is from Gavekal Research's Monthly Strategy
Although right now it feels like the bottom has already been reached on March 23rd for the S&P after the market has risen 19% since then and FOMO emotions arise, history says that running out and using up all of my dry powder right away probably isn't the most prudent action to take.
March 23, 2020 - I added to Fairfax Financial today. This is very similar to my investment in Oaktree Capital where I am investing alongside, in my opinion, one of the best capital allocators. For my investment in Oaktree, I was investing alongside Howard Marks and with this investment in Fairfax I am investing alongside Prem Watsa.
Prem's goal is to compound book value at 15% per year which if he can achieve this then my investment will be doubling every 5 years. There is no guarantee he can do this but he does have a good track record despite his recent sluggish performance from 2011 to 2016 due to the large hedges he put on based on his macro economic outlook.
At the current price per share of $280 I am investing at a 50% discount to book value. Fairfax is an insurance company that does well when there aren't any natural disasters such as typhoons, hurricanes, earthquakes, etc. Right now we are going through a pandemic related to a virus and I'm unsure how much this is going to affect insurers like Berkshire Hathaway, Markel, and Fairfax. I can't find the answer but I don't think Fairfax's policies insure against this virus so if this guess is correct then this company is even more undervalued since it won't have to pay out policy holders.
Fairfax currently has a big investment in Atlas Corp which is run by David Sokol who used to be partners with Warren Buffett at Berkshire Hathaway before he resigned due to recommending a stock to Warren without disclosing all of the necessary information that he should have. Despite this setback David has a great track record of compounding capital at his former company Mid American Energy and that is why Prem invested 50% of Fairfax's investment portfolio alongside David.
Fairfax is very well capitalized but the biggest risk I see with this company is the possibility of poor underwriting and poor investment picks by Prem Watsa. Keep in mind that he's not perfect with his decision to buy Blackberry being one indicator of that and I'm not the biggest fan of his decision to invest in Toys R' Us. Overall he's done very well though and Fairfax also has exposure to India through Fairfax India which is likely to be one of the fastest growing economies over the next 2 decades.
March 20, 2020 - I think ViacomCBS will be a two or three bagger from today's price so I initiated a position today based on the following reasons:
They own lots of valuable content including films such as The Godfather, Top Gun, South Park, Forrest Gump, Titanic (50%), The Wolf of Wall St. (in the U.S.) and Star Trek.
I think the virus will be settled down by the summer and football season will go on therefore CBS should see high advertisement revenue from airing NFL games.
March Madness basketball is canceled this year but I'm expecting high ad revenues next year and beyond as March madness returns.
Owns the BlackRock building at 51 w 52nd street in Manhattan which they're set to sell following the virus.
Own several valuable cable channels including Comedy Central, BET, Showtime, MTV and Nickelodeon.
Insiders are buying including 2 $1M purchases from from Shari Redstone over the last 2 months.
Seth Klarman initiated a position in q4 2019 and buying at the current price is a better entry point.
Valuation ratios of TTM P/E of 2.7, P/S of .5, TTM P/FCF of 9 and EV/EBIT of 10.
Return on invested capital has consistently been above 10%.
The market fears that ViacomCBS won't be able to transition to the new streaming environment and they are too leveraged to the old cable business model but in a worse case scenario I see their content as too valuable compared to what the current market price is suggesting. I never invest based on takeovers alone but I do point out that another company acquiring ViacomCBS is an option.
If this goes wrong it's most likely because there is a high debt load arising from the merger of Viacom and CBS last year.
March 19, 2020 - At the end of the last cycle/bull market (I'm assuming that we're are currently in a recession) I was looking at companies that were less quality businesses because all of the quality businesses were overpriced and the semi-high quality businesses were either overpriced or fully priced.
I bought some due to the limited opportunities available and this resulted in me holding some less quality businesses that I wish I didn't own. I could have used the excess capital to invest in better opportunities right now.
Don't forget this feeling in the next cycle.
Right now I'm focused on companies that have good balance sheets to weather this downturn.
March 18, 2020 - I looked at Boeing's balance sheet today after I heard both Jim Cramer and Bill Ackman mention that Boeing will need a bailout and won't be able to survive without one.
They have $9.5B in cash and $7.5B in short-term debt. So why won't they be able to survive if they can pay their current debt?
Because they won't be able to pay their suppliers. Keep this in mind as you research companies because it is important. Boeing also has $51.5B in deferred revenue and I didn't look up what this is in their filings because I'm being lazy but this must be deposits they took from customers for future orders. Right now the last thing the airlines are thinking about is future orders. They may want their deposits back and this would ruin Boeing in addition to all of the accounts payables that needs to be paid.
Although I do think the government will bail this company out, I'm going to pass on this company as an investment.
In contrast to this, Mark Cuban said this morning on CNBC that he is buying stock in two companies: Twitter and Live Nation. I looked up both of their balance sheets and their financial positions are solid. Lots of cash exceeding accounts payable, short-term debt and accrued liabilities.
March 17, 2020 - Anheuser Busch tapped out their whole credit facility of $9B and I like this decision. It's amazing. Never in my models did I envision a scenario where Anheuser Busch's operations would be operating at such limited capacity.
I thought this company was a bargain at $50-$70 and I never imagined it would be selling for $33-$40 a share. Admit it... you're scared to buy here. Even after everything you've read. And of course I am. I don't know how long this shutdown will last and Anheuser Busch has so much debt there is a lot of uncertainty. Yes, their debt is very spread out with the majority priced in low fixed rates and financed over long periods of time but there are unknowns such as debt covenants. What if there are debt covenants that are based on Anheuser Busch's Debt/EBITDA ratios that all cause debt to be paid much sooner? This is an unknown that can have a huge effect. Luckily the banks seem to be well capitalized at the moment.
Anheuser Busch has $7.2B in cash with $5.4B in short-term debt and they just got $9B more from their credit facility. They also have $16B in accounts payable, $1.3 in taxes payable (current liability), and another $6B in accrued liabilities. They're operating at a very limited capacity but it looks like they could get through this year ok now that they tapped their credit facility.
The issue is demand is psychological and just because these shutdowns end it doesn't mean people will be automatically going out as much as they used to. Lots of events will eventually continue such as sporting events which will be a big boost for beer sales but I'm expecting a lag in demand before beer sales reach near the levels they were at in 2018 and 2019 because of the large layoffs the economy is about to see and because there will likely be a delay when consumers rush out to spend money since we're creatures of habit and have been more accustomed to staying at home for weeks. In testament to this last sentence, consumers in China haven't had a surge in demand following the large drop in cases of coronavirus and the opening up of stores and restaurants.
March 16, 2020 - Added to Shake Shack today. Shake Shack restaurants are always crowded and they have some of the best tasting food thanks to Danny Meyer's great cooking skills and his determination to create the best tasting food.
They're still open for takeout and delivery which should help them stay afloat as the coronavirus takes away a large amount of revenue from the entire industry. Shake Shack has $37M in cash & equivalents, another $36.5M in short term investments and no financial debt. They do have leases on their stores though that they rent out to sell their food. For this year they have $32M due in leases of which about 1/12th of that would be due each month in rent but I expect the virus will calm down during the warmer weather. They also have payables which can be decreased if they need to lay off staff and delay payments on orders for food supplies.
In other words, I see a great company with a short term setback that is very solvable for them which led to the equity being available at a great price for the long term.
February 18, 2020 - This game is hard. You sold Virgin Galactic way too soon and would have realized a lot higher return by being more patient and holding on. This resulted in a sizable opportunity cost for you.
The way to prevent this mistake from happening again is to understand your position a lot more before getting into it. This way you will be able to hold on for the long term without worrying about day-to-day fluctuations.
February 16, 2020 - The following quotes come from Terry Smith's 2019 annual letter for Fundsmith LLP. He writes why it is better to be a GARP investor instead of a value investor. It comes down to ROIC and how GARP companies compound for long periods of time where value stocks appreciate back to fair value but then need to be sold and the capital needs to find a new place to be invested. This incurs transaction costs and taxes. The hard part about buying GARP companies for value investors is they appear to be expensive rather than cheap but since they are compounding at higher rates they aren't expensive.
"To quote from Investment Adviser ‘Looking at PE ratios there is evidence in abundance that shows that from a relative perspective quality stocks may today be considered expensive.’ The interesting point about that assertion is that it was published on 13th August 2012. A lot of superior returns have been had from those allegedly expensive stocks in the subsequent seven years."
"Value investing has its flaws as a strategy. Markets are not perfect but they are not totally inefficient either and most of the stocks which have valuations which attract value investors have them for good reason — they are not good businesses."
"Moreover, even when the value investor gets it right and this happens, they then need to sell the stock which has achieved this and find another undervalued stock and start again. This activity obviously incurs dealing costs but value investing is not something which can be pursued with a ‘buy and hold’ strategy. In investment you ‘become what you eat’ insofar as over the long term the returns on any portfolio which has such an approach will tend to gravitate to the returns generated by the companies themselves, which are low for most value stocks."
"As Charlie Munger, Warren Buffett’s business partner, said: ‘Over the long term, it’s hard for a stock to earn a much better return
than the business which underlies it earns. If the business earns six percent on capital over forty years and you hold it for that forty years, you’re not going to make much different than a six percent return — even if you originally buy it at a huge discount.
Conversely, if a business earns eighteen percent on capital over twenty or thirty years, even if you pay an expensive looking price,
you’ll end up with one hell of a result.’"
"The biggest flaw in value investing is that is does not seek to take advantage of a unique characteristic of equities. Equities are the only asset in which a portion of your return is automatically reinvested for you. The retained earnings (or free cash flow if you prefer that measure, as we do) after payment of the dividend are reinvested in the business. This does not happen with real estate — you receive rent not a further investment in buildings, or with bonds — you get paid interest but no more bonds. This retention of earnings which are reinvested in the business can be a powerful mechanism for compounding gains."
"Here’s how Buffett explained this change in his 1989 letter to Berkshire Hathaway shareholders: ‘The original 'bargain' price probably will not turn out to be such a steal after all. In a difficult business, no sooner is one problem solved than another surfaces — never is there just one cockroach in the kitchen. [Plus], any initial advantage you secure will be quickly eroded by the low return that the business earns. For example, if you buy a business for $8 million that can be sold or liquidated for $10 million and promptly take either course, you can realize a high return. But the investment will disappoint if the business is sold for $10 million in ten years and in the interim has annually earned and distributed only a few percent on cost. Time is the friend of the wonderful business, the enemy of the mediocre.’"
February 6, 2020 - Following up on my journal entry from February 3rd, Whitney Tilson recently wrote about the possibility of Exxon likely being a value trap following their poor 4th quarter earnings release.
He believes Exxon is hiding the fact that they had to sell assets and take on debt just to afford to pay their dividend.
He also points out that their revenue and operating cash flow has been falling over the past 10 years and that Exxon not including their balance sheet and cash flow statement in their earnings release is likely due to them hiding the deterioration of their business.
Whitney doesn't see them cutting their dividend yet since they can continue to fund the dividend over the next few years with more asset sales and debt plus he also sees it as being really bad for the stock price if they were to cut it.
The switch to alternative forms of more environmental friendly energy like solar and wind and the transition from internal combustion engines to electric vehicles are reasons for revenue to continue to trend down in the future and result in a classic value trap for Exxon.
And if oil and gas prices were to rise then a better play would be to buy a smaller energy company since this would yield a much higher return than Exxon would.
February 3, 2020 - What is a value trap?
It is an investment that appears to be undervalued based on financial metrics such as P/E, P/B, P/S, P/FCF, EV/EBIT, etc., but actually isn't undervalued because the cheap price and cheap financial metrics are due to the business' deteriorating earning power.
Are KHC, Baidu, and oil stocks (BP, XOM, Shell) value traps?
They were once saying MSFT was a value trap in 2011.
It wasn't a value trap because Microsoft's core business (Windows operating system) was still throwing off lots of free cash flow and when you looked around, computers with the Windows operating system were in universities and offices all around and they were still being bought due to the inconvenience that users would have had to endure if they had to relearn a new operating system (switching moat). The catalyst was it still had this moat and the company was able to use these cash flows to successfully invest in other growth areas like cloud to avoid being a value trap.
Will BP, XOM, and Shell be able to reinvest their cash flows from petroleum into other areas like renewable energy to avoid being a value trap? Since oil and gas are commodities this makes the question harder to answer because there isn't much of a moat compared to Microsoft. I guess the answer is I can't say with as much confidence as I was able to with Microsoft.
Will Baidu be able to successfully reinvest their cash flows from search into AI and cloud despite heavy competition from Alibaba, Tencent, and ByteDance? I think so because the advertising market in China is so huge that I think all 4 can have their share. Plus I think Baidu has a strong enough moat in search to retain market share for the time being.
Will Kraft Heinz be able to successfully reinvest their cash flows from Heinz to pay off debt and reinvest in the Kraft and Oscar Meyers brands that are in desperate need of R&D and advertising dollars? Will they be able to correctly decipher which brands can and can't be fixed? I think Oscar Meyers cold cuts (not the bacon) is mostly a value trap but most of the other brands like Planters, Philadelphia, A1, Capri Sun, Lunchables, Kraft Dressing, Kraft Cheese, Velveeta and Kraft Mac & Cheese can be turned around.
January 27, 2020 - Exited Virgin Galactic with an overall gain despite realizing a loss on November 7, 2019. Not sure of the long-term prospects of the business at the moment despite sell side analysts picking up coverage on the stock and giving a bullish outlook.
I thought this would be a part investment for Chamath Palihapitiya's holding company but all of my shares were converted to Virgin through a SPAC instead. I adjusted my position on November 7th to reflect what I thought would have been my allocation had this been the setup that I originally thought it was going to be.
I planned on holding it long-term but then my emotions got the best of me as I saw a gain in the company but wasn't sure how confidently I could value this company due to the uncertainty of what the future business prospects will look like. I'm content with the outcome now because I did realize a quick gain but am not happy that I didn't have the emotion to do what I originally intended to do - hold this long term.
Setting up a system that prevents me from checking stock prices too often would be very helpful for me but then again I am comfortable holding my other positions long term so perhaps my uneasiness with holding this one for the long term was a sign that I needed to sell.
"If you don't feel comfortable owning a stock for 10 years, you shouldn't own it for 10 minutes."
- Warren Buffett
January 16, 2020 - 8 quotes from a part of Saber Capital Management's great investment letter:
1. "In total, we had five main holdings which made up about 80% of the fund’s assets."
2. "Homebuilders tend to have cash flow statements that look a lot like energy producers: they earn cash from the sale of a finished home, but that home sits on land that has to be replaced, and so the profit has to be constantly reinvested into new land. Like an oil well that slowly bleeds dry and requires a new well to maintain production levels, builders are constantly pouring their cash flow back into the ground in order to stay in business. I think of these types of business models like hamster wheels: the minute you stop running, the wheel stops turning. Businesses like homebuilders, energy producers (and maybe even video streaming companies) have to keep pouring cash in or else their business “wheel” stops turning."
3. "Lesson: Anchoring on a previous price is a mistake that I’ve often made, and I hope to do a better job guarding against this bias going forward."
4. "There will be lots of mistakes going forward, from stocks we missed and also from stocks we did buy but shouldn’t have, but I try to think of mistakes like capital expenditures that are necessary education costs that pave the way to greater returns in the future (I’ll be sure to remind you of this glass-half full mindset next time our fund has a bout of underperformance)."
5."All of this means missed opportunities will be our biggest source of mistakes, and I’ll do my best to minimize this cost going forward."
6. "Over the past 5 years, with exceptions that you could probably count on two hands, Apple has outperformed the entire hedge fund industry, every one of the 10,000+ mutual funds, the passive funds at Vanguard and Blackrock, the most prestigious private equity funds, and the vast majority of venture capital funds in Silicon Valley. We’re talking about many trillions of dollars in all kinds of investment vehicles with all kinds of fees, managed by extremely smart people with unlimited research budgets and super smart employees, who all work extremely hard, and are all highly incentivized to produce great results. And Apple beat nearly every last one of them, including Saber Investment Fund, LP."
7."I’ve compiled a lengthy investment journal devoted solely to Apple in my files, with many different observations on the business, its products, its customers, the competition, its competitive advantages, and its vulnerabilities. But one overarching takeaway is humans overreact to short-term news, forcing stock prices away from their true value – even when the company is the largest in the world. Of course, there will always be stocks that outperform the portfolios of virtually everyone at times, but it’s important to remember that these outperformers don’t necessarily have to come from the best hidden, most complicated, or least understood companies. Sometimes bargains hide in plain sight."
8."Facebook had a great year, as revenue grew by nearly 30%. I wrote about an email that Jeff Raikes sent to Warren Buffett in 1996, outlining why Microsoft was such a great business. One factor was that Microsoft was able to earn profits off of capital investments that someone else (IBM) made. Facebook is a modern day example: Verizon and AT&T spent tens of billions to deliver internet to our homes, and Facebook (among others) took the lion’s share of the profits that stemmed from that invested capital. But Facebook goes one step further because not only does it leverage someone else’s capital, but it also has a business model where its own users produce their own content for each other to consume."
January 2, 2020 - Luckin Coffee is an interesting company that has seen a lot of growth recently. It is riding a coffee consumption wave in China that looks to be in its very early stages due to coffee consumption being so low in China compared to other areas of the world like Europe, Japan, and the US.
Luckin has a very simple business model that I think they were able to have so much success because of their understanding of the Chinese culture.
Luckin Coffee leases very small shops and hires only 2 or 3 workers per store. Luckin has a mobile app where consumers (mostly office workers with modest to high incomes looking for quick service) order on the app and then go to the small shop and pick up their coffee and leave. The ordering and paying are done on the app.
I've added it to my watchlist but I won't buy now.
I think the company will attract competition due to the limited barriers of entry since the business model is really just a small leased space, an app, and coffee sales. Not a hard-to-replicate business model and I think Starbucks will copy this strategy, although they already have a different strategy where consumers order and drink their coffee in Starbucks coffee shops. I just don't think Starbucks will continue to watch Luckin gain so much market share while Starbucks misses out on a big opportunity that isn't hard to copy. Luckin's idea will likely attract other competitors as well in my opinion. Hopefully they will be able to grow fast enough and build a brand name to help them in the meantime though.
Also, the valuation looks way too expensive for me now at 18 times sales and no profits.
December 30, 2019 - Read a really good report about Naspers so I added Naspers to my watchlist. I haven't done much deep research on the company but I am familiar with it due to its large holding in Tencent which I have been researching a lot lately.
Naspers has been up around 20% over the last 3 months so it looks like the market did see a bargain when Naspers was trading at $28 a share.
Naspers is a media company that is based in South Africa but they also hold a lot of ownership interests in growing tech companies. Management has done very well at identifying high growth tech companies and investing in them in their early stages.
They currently have investments in classifieds, payments & fintech, food delivery, travel and social & internet platforms.
They spun off a lot of their ownership interests in their growing tech companies into a company called Prosus which they own 74% of. Some of the companies in Prosus' portfolio are Tencent, mail.ru, delivery Hero, Ctrip, Emag, Payu, Olx, Avito, Dubizzle, and Letgo.
The spinoff company (Prosus) trades at a discount to its sum of the parts valuation and Naspers which owns 78% of Prosus also trades at a discount to its sum of the parts valuation. From what I read there is no capital gains tax for selling the shares. I need to do more research but I think this company will outperform over the next 10 years. Until I do more research and hopefully get a lower price (I'm probably anchoring here on the price since I looked at the 1 and 5 year price chart), I won't invest.
December 18, 2019 - I think Kraft Heinz will be a turnaround story and the majority of their brands will recover. I think the Q3 2019 results already showed that a turnaround is already starting to go in the right direction and I believe that 2020 will be a turnaround year for the company. If not 2020, then I see a 2-3 year time frame to turn it around.
Here are the reasons why:
There is a new CEO and CFO. Miguel Patricio has experience in marketing and turning around brands at Amheuser-Busch. He is what Kraft needs. He also understands that more capital need to be allocated to marketing and innovation for existing brands. They also replaced their CFO which I feel gives the company more experience in that position.
Debt repayment - Kraft has already started to repay debt with their debt decreasing by 2-3B over the past 2 years and they also just sold their Canadian cheese brand to raise funds for debt restructuring. They also bought back debt in September. I don't believe that Kraft will engage in any M&A that will hurt their debt position in the near future since management has emphasized that debt reduction is a priority.
Kraft still has some good brands like Heinz, Quero and Philadelphia which had positive organic sales growth this year. I also believe other brands like Planters, Kraft Macaroni & Cheese, Velveeta, Kraft Cheese (but not singles) Capri Sun, A1 and some others aren't bad and will recover after increases in marketing and R&D expense.
Asset sales - Kraft is looking to sell more brands to raise money for debt reduction but aren't doing it at irrational prices. Pulled back on Maxwell House most likely because they couldn't get a reasonable price due to negative outlook from media.
Lots of insider buys. The Chairman of 3G Capital, Jorge, bought close to $100M of stock in the direct market and a director on the board bought around $7M. Meanwhile, Warren Buffett's stake is still the same as it was when he first merged the 2 companies and 3G Capital still holds a large stake as well of about 20% of the outstanding shares.
Current price - $31.60
Target price - $41.66
Timeframe - 1-3 years
November 20, 2019 - Initiated a position in Alcon today. I bought this one at a high valuation. I'm applying the cliche "buy a great business at a fair price" here because I see Alcon as a great business. My analysis here is somewhat 80% qualitative, 10% technical and 10% quantitative.
The 10% technical is because the stock has had a very strong support level at $55 per share since its IPO in April 2019.
The 10% quantitative is because the company is trading at 29x 2019 earnings, 3.7 price to sales ratio, and EV to EBIT of around 24 times which is a little bit expensive.
The 80% qualitative part is because Alcon is one of the leading eye care companies in the world. They have a strong market position in ocular surgical supplies and contact lenses. I purchase their contact lenses solution and it works well. I see a brand moat here due to the eye being a sensitive place so once you find a product that works well you don't want to switch. There are some competitors like Cooper, Johnson and Johnson, and Bausch & Lomb which make it somewhat of a competitive market but there are lots of people who need help with their vision. This includes cataract surgery and vitreoretinal surgery which Alcon manufactures equipment for. Glass eyewear isn't part of Alcon's business model but contact lenses and Lasik are and both have large markets.
Now that Alcon is separated from Novartis, Alcon can focus on growing their business much better. Since the eye doctors have a huge influence on what their patients use (my eye doctor recommended Alcon contacts solution and Johnson and Johnson contact lenses), Alcon I think can help their business a lot by focusing on forming good trustworthy relationships with them. I think Colgate did a wonderful job forming relationships with dentists and building lots of shareholder value for their shareholders.
November 19, 2019 - Chris Mayer gave a presentation on 100 baggers at the MicroCap Leadership Summit in September 2016. He told an interesting story about a friend of his whose wife bought a painting for $150,000. His friend then hung the painting in his living room and however many years later he went to sell it at an auction. The painting sold at the auction for $2.3 million, much more than what he believed he could sell it for. This caused Chris's friend to then think to himself how he was able to realize this return and he realized the reason was because it hung in his living room the whole time and no body offered him a price to buy it. If someone offered to buy it for $500,000, $800,000, or even $1,000,000 he very likely would have sold it and so he would have never allowed it to reach $2.3 million.
The stock market works very different. 5 days a week between 9:30 AM and 4 PM you can get your stocks priced from the market. The temptation to look is what doesn't allow us to realize the full potential of our returns on the securities we own.
If there was a recommendation I could give to my online broker it would be to create a "hide" function inside my online portfolio therefore every time I log on I can hide the prices of the securities I own so I'm less tempted to act when I should be doing nothing.
Here is the summary of what Chris Mayer said 100 baggers have in common:
1. Start small (he must be talking about market cap)
2. You've got to hold for a long time
3. Low multiples preferred (price to earnings)
4. High returns on capital are really important (because to go up 100x it has to be a good business)
5. Owner-operators preferred (but not required)
Without doing any research, a company that comes to mind if I had to pick one that I think will be a 100 bagger during my lifetime starting from today's market cap would be Shake Shack. Although it technically doesn't meet all of the qualifications above to be a 100 bagger so maybe it's more of just a gut feeling of mine. (Shake Shack has a high P/E multiple of 90 and low ROIC)
November 7, 2019 - You had to take your 2nd realized loss today because of a mistake you made.
You bought IPOA because you thought it was a holding company that Chamath Palihapitiya was going to use to invest in high growth companies similar to what he did at his previous venture capital fund. You knew one of his investments was going to be Virgin Galactic (SPCE) but you didn't know that all of the funds raised for IPOA were going to be used in the reverse merger with Virgin Galactic. So what you ended up with was a position that you felt you were overly allocated to and a company that you are very uncertain of on the long-term economics of the business.
Virgin Galactic caters to the super wealthy with a price of $250,000 to sign up for space flight. It's a limited market and although it has the market to itself as of now and already has reservations from people who already booked, there could be possible competition from Blue Origin, Space X and possibly others soon. It is also not cheap to fly spacecraft which is going to result in very high maintenance costs to service the operations of the business and high insurance costs. As an investment with a far out time frame I'm OK with the investment provided that I'm properly allocated to it.
Therefore, I trimmed my position by 70% to reflect a more comfortable allocation which is slightly higher than what I originally thought Social Capital Hedosophia was going to be allocated to Virgin. This trimming resulted in the second loss that you had to take as an investor.
What you learned is that it is better to be patient and gather more information and facts than to rush into a position.
October 24, 2019 - On dataroma.com I saw that Mohnish Pabrai added a company called GrafTech to his portfolio with a 16% position in 2nd quarter of 2019. I wondered why he added this very little known company to his portfolio but found out in the Fall 2019 Graham and Dodd Newsletter.
GrafTech is a manufacturer of high-performance electrodes which go into electric furnaces that are used in mini mills to make steel. Nucor is a customer. There are only 3 or 4 other producers of these electrodes in the world and it takes 3-5 years to build a new manufacturing facility so there shouldn't be an unforeseen abundance of supply out of no where over the next 3 years.
A main input cost of making these electrodes is a raw material called needle coke and that has a limited number of suppliers as well with GrafTech themselves owning their own needle coke facility to protect themselves from disruptions in their manufacturing line.
Prices for these electrodes went crazy so GrafTech went to 100's of their customers and locked in 70% of their production over the next couple years at take-or-pay contracts set at a fixed price to ease the uncertainty for their customers.
Mohnish sees limited downside due to these locked in prices with contracts that take 70% of their production and the other 30% will be priced at the market. The 70% take or pay contracts is the margin of safety and what limits the downside, meanwhile the 30% of production with prices at the spot price are what create the upside. Of course there is no guarantee that the 30% will be bought at high prices but if they are then GrafTech can be a double or triple. If they aren't bought at high prices but low prices instead, the take-or-pay contracts should provide enough income over the next couple of years to support the share price that Mohnish bought at.
I write this in my journal not to copy Mohnish's idea but to look back one day and see how this idea and analysis plays out. I've decided I'm not going to take ideas from others that I don't truly understand because most importantly I won't know when to sell or if the thesis changes, I know that I wont be comfortable having my capital locked into this stock for a long period of time. Mohnish gives this idea a 5-year time frame to develop and I don't see myself willing to be that patient with a company I don't understand that well nor have much interest to learn and follow.
I just saw a commercial for Domino's Pizza during the Thursday night football game and boy was I wrong about that stock. I remember when I was somewhere between the age of 23-26, I would ignore Domino's as an investment just because I didn't think they had any competitive moat because there were limited barriers to entry. It just isn't hard to set up a pizza company. There are a lot of mom and pop small business pizza companies and a lot of them are good. Especially a lot located by me. Over the past 10 years, Domino's has doubled revenue and tripled operating income. That's impressive since they have not had a losing year of net income over the last 10 years also. The folly in my thinking was that I didn't dig deep enough into the company enough although I enjoyed the taste of all of their food that I tried. Their chicken kickers, cheesy bread, sweet bread, regular pizza and thin crust are all good. It turns out having scale along with a low cost business model (cheese, bread, sauce, small stores) with great tasting recipes can create a lot of shareholder value for its investors. Especially if the majority of the value created is reinvested back into the business and further compounded.
October 20, 2019 - In this interview for the Fall 2019 Graham and Dodd Newsletter, Mohnish Pabrai talks about how he had leveraged financial institutions in his portfolio which he bought during the 08 recession and lots of them went to zero.
He says, "I still have one levered financial institution in my portfolio. When you're an alcoholic, you just can't give it up. So hopefully by talking to you now the lesson is getting seared into my mind: don't go near levered financial institutions."
We all have our bad tendencies in one thing or another. What is your bad tendency in investing likely going to be throughout your lifetime?
It is possible that it could be oil companies and processed food companies. They have compounded well in the past and have paid generous dividend also but the past isn't any indication of the future. Oil isn't likely to play the same role in our global economy over the next 100 years as it has over the previous 100 years due to climate change and electric cars, and processed food companies have more competition with newer generations who are much more health conscious in what they eat. New ways of advertising particularly through the internet and social media are decreasing the barriers to entry advantage of shelf space at grocery stores that food processing companies have had in the past also. Right now, you currently own KHC, MDLZ and GIS.
Here is another good quote I saw from Mohnish Pabrai in that Fall 2019 Newsletter above: "I have never seen Warren Buffett make a dumb bet with levered financial institutions. I think his batting average is 100%. But I've seen him make a ton of mistakes on retailers. If you were to sum up all the Berkshire acquisitions, their records is actually not great. But if you weight them by actual capital deployed, their record is unbelievable."
Tweedy Brown cut their stake in Baidu by 41% last quarter. There are macro headwinds in the Chinese online advertising market and Baidu has been experiencing greater competition, particularly from ByteDance which I also saw that they have been successful in gaining a large user base in the US which now has Facebook's attention. I saw this in an internal memo between Mark Zuckerberg and employees and then I believe in a news notification on Seeking Alpha that said ByteDance is poaching Facebook employees.
I saw an online article that mentioned an internal memo was released by Robin Li who emphasized to employees to be frugal and refrain from travelling business class, staying at 4-star hotels and encouraged employees to only use 1 towel when washing their hands in the bathroom as opposed to more than what is necessary. These acts aren't emphasized in really good times so these signs need to be noted because it is likely - judging from recent quarterly results and what you're reading - that Baidu's moat isn't as strong as it has been in the past. Luckily they have a good balance sheet with cash outweighing debt by a decent amount at the moment.
September 30, 2019 - The retirement of CEO Bob Dudley that was announced today means I need to look deeper into BP.
I initiated a small position in Social Capital Hedosophia this morning.
I believe the next big growth industries are "the internet of things" and "AI". But which companies will win? Does it matter if you can identify the next big growth industries but not the companies in the industries? Does the difficulty of selecting the winners mean you shouldn't at least try?
Two of the big and possibly 3 winners that I think will be in AI and IOT are Google #1, Facebook #2 and possibly Amazon. Your investment in Baidu partially speaks to your guess that AI will be the next big wave of growth technology. Baidu has a good and profitable existing business with a huge market share of search in China and at the current market cap you're getting its AI division (Apollo and Duer) for free.
I've been researching Micron and AMD recently. Will semiconductors be needed to operate all of the other gadgets in the internet of things (refrigerators, billboards, doorbells, etc)? My guess is yes, but the companies who win now won't win later, similar to how Intel won PCs but missed mobile phones. (Note: Still have to read Clayton Christensen's book The Innovator's Dilemma)
Look into a company you found today from an interview called Quarterhill.
September 27, 2019 - Social Capital Hedosophia Holdings is a company I have been investigating recently as a "bet on the jockey" company. It is a blank check company that looks for other companies to invest in or merge with. They raised around $600M in a trust fund to invest in other companies. It is set up to be similar to a venture capital firm but the objective of the firm is to make it easier for private companies to IPO. They announced that they will invest $100M in a merger with Virgin Galactic and Chamath will be the Chairman. Social Capital Hedosophia is a very risky investment since they are a blank check company and they will be looking to invest in companies of a similar caliber to what a venture capital firm would invest in. Since the companies they plan to invest in are high-risk, this investment won't be a significant part of my portfolio.
I've listened to Chamath Palihapitiya before in interviews and podcasts and I've read his annual letter last year. I think he is a tell-it-like-it-is operator who is intelligent and also bold. He has had success as an executive at Facebook, at his venture capital firm where he was generating around 40% returns (gross) and low 20% net of fees I believe. He has invested in Slack, Box, Palantir and is also an investor in the Golden State Warriors. He owns around 17% of Social Capital Hedosophia. I recall on a podcast how he was looking to set up an investment vehicle similar to Berkshire Hathaway and I think this might be his attempt because this setup will give him better access to permanent capital where he won't have to face the risk of capital withdraws from LPs as he could have been in his venture capital partnership and he won't have to deal with limited partners criticizing his every move. He will still have risks like the manic depressive stock market at times when the economy crashes though and likely will have to answer to Wall St. analysts depending on how he handles guidance. He may choose to not give short-term guidance which I think would probably be the best option since it will help everyone focus on the long-term.
The risks I see are the firm making investments in poor companies, the companies they purchase aren't operated well, I'm wrong about Chamath's investing ability and everything else I can't think of. There are some articles written about Chamath on the internet that he wasn't showing up to work at his previous fund, a lot of people were leaving, and some other stuff which are red flags but I still believe Chamath has the ability to compound capital at high rates and investing in this company would give me an opportunity to invest alongside him.
September 13, 2019 - BP has been a holding of mine which has been relatively flat over the past 5 years ranging between $30 and $46 a share not including the dividend. I don't see this company as a capital compounder but I do believe it makes for a good value idea. BP is issuing a dividend of $2.46 a share and at BP's current price of $37.87 it is yielding 6.5% which is very good. BP has generated positive free cash flow of about $7.7 billion over the last 12 months which is good but it doesn't cover the dividend which is about $8.37B. They have been selling assets to help pay for the oil spill settlement which helped bring in $1B after you account for the PP&E that they purchased as well. Asset sales will continue to help alleviate the settlement payments. Including this $1B, they were able to fund their operations and pay off the dividend without raising capital. WTI oil averaged around $65 a barrel during 2018 and is now at $55 a barrel so covering the dividend might not come as easy this year or the next depending on where oil prices are.
The CEO, Bob Dudley, has done a very good job in my opinion in managing BP. He was able to work out a manageable settlement for BP to pay $18.5 billion dollars over around a decade; he has increased safety to prevent future disasters; he has sold assets every year for around the past 7 to raise cash to pay off the settlement, debt and to better position BP for the risk of low oil prices; bought shale assets from BHP Billiton for what appear to be attractive prices today and he has been able to lower BP's cost of production. BP is now profitable at $55 to $60 per barrel of oil.
I believe that electric vehicles will come someday but predicting the exact timing is difficult. I don't see the infrastructure in place now and believe it would be hard to implement over the next 5 years for a major transition away from ICE cars. Even 10 years would be difficult. There needs to be more electric charging stations, better affordability, and better mile range. Also, the electric power grid still needs to be powered in order to supply the electricity to the charging stations and it is likely that fossil fuels will be supplying this electricity for the next 5 to 10 years. Natural gas is the best option of the 3 major fossil fuels. A transition away from oil for automobiles would still badly hurt BP's business so this should be monitored closely.
I see this company as undervalued with good management and a good balance sheet. I don't see a major shift away from a world powered by oil and natural gas in the near future but do need to monitor this. Look to add to your position if BP drops to $35-$36 per share.
August 14, 2019 - Yield curve inverted today. This has preceded a recession every time since 1980 so Mr. Market got more worried than usual and was selling the biggest 500 businesses in the U.S. for almost 3% less on average than he was yesterday. Last time the yield curve inverted was 2007 and although it has been a good indicator of predicting a recession, the timing hasn't been perfect. The difference between yields on the 2 and 10 year went negative in December 2005 and in May 1998 but the recessions didn't follow in both instances for around 2 years later. Predicting the exact timing of a recession is too difficult.
Germany's economy contracted .1% in the 2nd quarter. Another quarter of contraction would signal a recession.
Argentina's stock market dropped 50 something percent on Monday. I think that is the 2nd largest one day drop in history and is absurd. A 10% or 20% drop in a day is a lot yet alone 50%. Argentina was just able to issue a 100-year bond a little more than 2 years ago. That was issued in 2007 a year after a default.
6 month - 1.92%
1 year - 1.79%
2 year - 1.58%
5 year - 1.51%
7 year - 1.55%
10 year - 1.59%
Tencent reported earnings today and cited a poor advertising market in China. This doesn't bode well for Baidu. Tencent still reported an increase of I believe 20 something percent in operating profit due to cutting expenses and due to revenue from wechat and social gaming. Seems like they aren't as vulnerable to the advertising market as Baidu and Weibo are and this shows in their stock price which has held up more compared to Sina, Weibo, and Baidu.
All of this news is negative which gives you a gauge of the sentiment in the markets today - pessimistic.
Below is a passage written by Howard Marks in his letter "On the Other Hand" discussing the most recent decision from the Fed to cut rates by 25 basis points. Is it good for the markets because a lower Fed Funds rate can mean lower interest rates to discount future cash flows by or despite good economics data, did the Fed lower the rate because they see trouble ahead?
"My point is that a rate cut’s implications aren’t always as simple a matter as they may appear to be. Assuming the Fed is a good diagnostician, a decision to cut rates isn’t necessarily good news. You can argue that, if there’s trouble ahead, we’re better off with a rate cut than without one. But that still doesn’t make it good news. First, it means the Fed thinks trouble is looming. And second, it certainly doesn’t guarantee the problem will be solved. (It’s worth noting that 18 months after that first rate cut in September 2007 – during which time ten more cuts followed, eventually taking the fed funds rate to nearly zero – the S&P 500 finally bottomed out, down more than 50% from where it stood on the day of the first cut.)"
Negative yielding bonds from Charlie Bilello on August 5, 2019: https://twitter.com/charliebilello/status/1158394284917383168
August 7, 2019 - I need to reiterate an obvious investment principle/rule that is obvious in theory to adhere to but is much harder in practice to follow due to my laziness and greed. One must do his own work and own research and never buy on tips. Tips in the old days used to be a recommendation from a friend or an associate and although these obviously still happen today, with the development of the internet there are other ways to get tips such as from investment managers who publish research on a company and submit the research on a website. These ideas can be found in investment letters, 13F filings, websites, blogs, etc. I was recently tempted to buy a stock in a company called Burford capital and put in a very small order to buy 3 days ago. The company is now being accused of being an accounting fraud and the stock has gone from around $17 a share to $6 in only a day. Although it would have only been a small loss for you on paper that wouldn't have had a material affect, it's still important that you must do your own research no matter how good the investor is. Developing bad habits will cause harm for you in the future as it will make you more lazy. You also need to understand the business you're buying. Although you have a broad idea of what the business does, you don't truly understand it and you know this after reading the short report put out today by Muddy Waters as you are reading the way Burford does its accounting you can tell you're still in the researching and learning phrase on this idea.
What does it do: Exchanges litigation financing in lawsuits for a fee and/or a percentage of the winnings in the lawsuits. Most of business is done in the U.S. and there are a lot of lawsuits in the U.S. 80-90% of lawsuits settle before going to court making it easier for Burford who finances the lawsuits to get performance fees since going to trial takes time.
Bull thesis: Lawsuit financing is a growing market without much competition at the moment. CEO is owner operator. Owns between 10-20% of the shares and has experience in the business and seems like he has a passion to be there for the long term.
Bear Thesis: Accounting can be hard to understand. Business involves lots of accounting estimates which can make earnings unreliable. High turnover at the CFO position and the current CEO is the CEO's wife.
Conclusion: it gets put in the too hard pile for now and you do nothing unless you can understand the company better.
As an aside, you bought more Wells Fargo in the mid $45's today. Your thesis from your previous journal entry in July is still intact but the market offered you an opportunity to add to your position today because of the drop in the 10 yr treasury yield. The curve got more inverted and banks are in the business of borrowing short-term and lending long-term so when rates are higher in the short term and lower in the long term (inverted yield curve), this makes for worse business for a bank. No business wants to borrow money at a higher rate and earn money at a rate that is lower than the rate at which they borrowed at.